2004-05-04                     House Journal                      Page 3814
HB 561                                                                                            
Representative Gatto gave notice of reconsideration of the vote on                                  
CSHB 561(FIN) (page 3809).                                                                          
                                                                                                    
Representative Gatto moved and asked unanimous consent that                                         
reconsideration of CSHB 561(FIN) be taken up on the same day.                                       
There being no objection, it was so ordered.                                                        
                                                                                                    
The following was again before the House in third reading:                                          
                                                                                                    
    CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 561(FIN)                                                                  
    "An Act providing for and relating to the issuance of general                                   
    obligation bonds in a principal amount of not more than                                         
    $93,280,000 for the purpose of paying the cost of state                                         
    transportation projects; and providing for an effective date."                                  
                                                                                                    
The question to be reconsidered:  "Shall CSHB 561(FIN) pass the                                     
House?"  The roll was taken with the following result:                                              
                                                                                                    
CSHB 561(FIN)--RECONSIDERATION                                                                      
Third Reading                                                                                       
Final Passage                                                                                       
                                                                                                    
YEAS:  34   NAYS:  5   EXCUSED:  1   ABSENT:  0                                                   
                                                                                                    

2004-05-04                     House Journal                      Page 3815
Yeas:  Anderson, Berkowitz, Chenault, Cissna, Crawford, Croft,                                      
Dahlstrom, Fate, Foster, Gatto, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Hawker,                                      
Heinze, Holm, Joule, Kapsner, Kerttula, Kohring, Kott, Masek,                                       
McGuire, Meyer, Morgan, Moses, Ogg, Rokeberg, Samuels, Seaton,                                      
Stepovich, Stoltze, Weyhrauch, Williams, Wilson                                                     
                                                                                                    
Nays:  Coghill, Gara, Harris, Lynn, Wolf                                                            
                                                                                                    
Excused:  Kookesh                                                                                   
                                                                                                    
And so, CSHB 561(FIN) passed the House on reconsideration.                                          
                                                                                                    
Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that the                                   
roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the                             
effective date clause.  There being no objection, it was so ordered.                                
                                                                                                    
CSHB 561(FIN) was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.